|
DigitalPulp
Publishing) Dear IDPF Members,
We are now on the cusp of great change in the publishing industry. The
long-predicted "break-out" of ebooks and related digital publications appears to
be very close at hand. It is an exciting time, considering where we've been
since the first ebook-bubble burst shortly after the dotcom collapse in 2000.
Some questions we need to ask: Is IDPF ready for this great growth? Can IDPF
fairly represent the many stakeholder groups in the digital publication
ecosystem? Will IDPF be an effective, representative trade organization that
will help guide the industry in a balanced way for the benefit of all? Or will
IDPF flounder in its mission and become irrelevant, or worse, become a front of
some stakeholder group to the exclusion of the others?
I strongly believe IDPF can be an effective agent in helping the industry
grow in the right direction. This direction is to serve the publishers and
content creators while considering the interests of the consumers who fuel the
industry. This can only be accomplished if IDPF continues to impartially
recognize and balance, by its actions, the needs among its many and diverse
stakeholder groups.
As a Director on the IDPF Board, I will work closely with the other eight
Directors to achieve diversity, balance and impartiality in Board decisions, for
both the trade and standards areas.
In addition, it is vitally important for the IDPF Board to take the long-term
view in its decision-making, and not to make hasty decisions based upon
short-term requests of a few members without first considering the longer-term
implications and the good of all its members.
I also want to see IDPF become a true "digital publication" organization, and
not just oriented towards trade books. Newspapers, periodicals,
academic/education textbooks, and commercial/government documents (to name just
a few) are publication types that are rapidly "going digital." It is vitally
important that IDPF step up its efforts to collaborate with the other
organizations representing those types of publications. IDPF must not go it
alone, as it has done in the past, particularly in the standards area.
In fact, this expansion of scope by IDPF will, in the long run, benefit the
trade books area, the original foundation upon which OeBF, the previous name of
IDPF, was launched in 1999.
As the IDPF representative for DigitalPulp Publishing (an independent ebook
publisher, promoter, distributor and retailer), I bring to the IDPF Board
fourteen years of quite diverse experience in the ebook industry. I have the
unique, holistic understanding of the vital role each stakeholder plays.
This includes the accessibility community, which for years I have given my
unwavering public support, not only because it is right to do so, but because
the goals of accessible digital publications are actually in full alignment with
the long-term goals of the digital publication industry standards.
Space does not permit me to exhaustively list here all my diverse experience
in the digital publication industry (refer to my
ebook bio).
But note that I have been involved, on an independent basis, with IDPF,
formerly OeBF, since the very beginning of the organization in 1999. I have
served on the Publication Structure Working Group as an invited expert,
including leadership roles as Chair of the Maintenance subgroup, and as acting
Vice Chair of PSWG.
With this experience, I am in the unique position of being very familiar with
IDPF, yet will bring into the IDPF Board a fresh, independent, forward-looking
perspective that I believe, and that you may believe, is needed.
I ask for your vote. Should the IDPF membership elect me to serve on the
Board as an at-large Director, it is my intent to personally contact each and
every member, to get your perspective on the direction IDPF should take, both in
the trade and standards areas. And my door will always be open since my role
will be to serve and represent you on the IDPF Board.
Thank you for your consideration.
Jon Noring
VP of Development
DigitalPulp Publishing
|